Quote Of The Day
Fake news is nothing but a false assumption taken literally, applied universally, and accepted unilaterally… until someone else makes up our minds for us. -Me
Post#: 096-19 – Words: 1092 – Audio: N/A
For the second time, and nearly a week later, I am posting yet another article in its entirety. Inside the last two years I’ve been watching what seemed to me an increase in Trump’s meanderings and word slippages during his speeches. As I’ve indicated from the beginning, Trump’s behavior and mental processes have always been in question.. but recently it’s gotten more profound. Personally I’ve been wondering if this is maybe all about his growing political and legal pressures from all sides. One has to be careful in bringing up things like “mental deficiencies” because one could be easily dismissed as having a distinct bias against the man to the point where one’s presumptions might be called a mental issue in itself.
The author of this article is Micheal D’Antonio, who also authored the book, “Never Enough: Donald Trump and the Pursuit of Success”, and co-authored with Peter Eisner, “The Shadow President: The Truth About Mike Pence”. I’ve heard him speak on various cable news outlets and he does come well-read on being a “Trump Whisperer” of sorts. In the end he remains just one of many authors of books that do not shine well about the President.
In this article for CNN’s site he discusses the signs of a person with increasing diminished capacity… which we do not want to see in a President at any time.
It’s not just that President Donald Trump has been spouting nonsense at a greater rate, although he is. What’s new is that his false statements are becoming more bizarre. He said this week, for example, that his Bronx-native father was born in Germany. And they are accompanied by other displays of apparent cognitive distress. Among the glaring examples:
- Last month, the President of the United States looked at Apple executive Tim Cook, one of the most important business leaders in the world, and called him Tim Apple.
- A few days earlier at a conservative conference where he literally hugged a flag, Trump ditched his script and rambled for two mostly incoherent hours. He mixed mockery, profanity and grandiosity in a style more suited to a barstool than a podium decorated with the presidential seal.
- In an Oval Office encounter with reporters this week, he repeatedly used the word “oranges” instead of “origins” to demand an investigation into the beginnings of the independent counsel’s probe of Russian influence in the 2016 election.
- Bizarrely, he told a GOP fundraiser audience that “they say” the sound created by energy-producing windmills “causes cancer.”
In any family, a 72-year-old man who spoke this way would be the subject of urgent discussions. Trump’s trouble accessing words, summoning long-term memories, and naming a famous man in front of him could indicate mental deterioration. Add the crazy talk about windmills and cancer, coming from the leader of the free world, and you get a situation that ought to alarm everyone.
This situation is complicated by Trump’s long and deep record of lying to suit his purpose. For decades, he made excessive claims about his wealth and abilities and the ratings for his reality TV show. Fantastic claims became his self-serving stock in trade. As a politician, Trump transferred this deceptive method into the political landscape — call it his lie-scape — and picked up the pace of the falsehoods.
Trump’s record makes it hard to pick out trends. Sometimes he seems to exaggerate and distort for effect. At other moments, it seems he believes the crazy stuff he says. But it is possible to evaluate a public figure’s speech patterns and make objective observations. In 2017, Stat News, the health news website, asked experts in neurolinguistics and cognitive assessment, psychologists and psychiatrists to review his past and recent speech and found evidence of decline from his younger days.
In interviews in the 1980s and ’90s,according to Stat News, Trump “spoke articulately, used sophisticated vocabulary, inserted dependent clauses into his sentences without losing his train of thought, and strung together sentences into a polished paragraph, which — and this is no mean feat — would have scanned just fine in print.”
More recently, noted Stat, “Trump’s vocabulary is simpler. He repeats himself over and over, and lurches from one subject to an unrelated one.” When shown examples of the two Trumps, experts saw symptoms that “can indicate slipping brain function due to normal aging or neurodegenerative disease.”
If Trump were a private citizen, his condition wouldn’t matter to anyone outside a close circle. He would be evaluated, his father’s Alzheimer’s disease might be noted as a red flag, and, one hopes, he would get the help he needs. But Trump is the most powerful person in the world and can do great harm with what he says.
In a flurry of tweets Tuesday, Trump mangled the facts of Puerto Rico’s hurricane recovery effort, suggesting the island has received $91 billion in relief money. (The correct figure is $11.2 billion; $91 billion is how much the federal government may disburse to Puerto Rico over the next two decades). He also planted the canard that somehow mainland farmers are being exploited in the equation. “Cannot continue to hurt our Farmers and States with these massive payments, and so little appreciation!” wrote Trump.
The Puerto Rico misstatements are so egregious that one hopes they could be blamed on a mind in decline. The alternative holds that Trump was lying and that he is an intentionally divisive and destructive leader of truly bad character who demonizes one set of constituents to stir resentment among another.
For Americans who are subject to Trump’s rhetoric, the most alarming element may be what it does to us. Leaders and those they lead exist in a dynamic relationship. A president’s words and gestures can both inspire and terrify. The talk coming from this President is frightening, destabilizing and bewildering. We don’t want to think that the man in the Oval Office is unfit, but when he repeatedly shows us the evidence, how can we draw another conclusion?
(See the article HERE.)
My other sites… if you’re interested…